Plaintiff’s amended statement of claim was undoubtedly vexatious pleading

Intellectual Property – Trademarks - Infringement

Plaintiff brought action against multiple defendants for trademark infringement. Defendants’ motions to strike out his statement of claim without leave to amend were granted while plaintiff’s motion for relief, including to disqualify counsel representing certain of defendants, was dismissed . Plaintiff appealed. Appeal dismissed. Plaintiff’s argument that motion judge should not have heard motions to strike must fail, as prior order had provided for motions to be dealt with during general sittings irrespective of appointment of case management judge. There was no merit to plaintiff’s contention that motion judge should have awaited appointment of case management judge. Motion judge was alive to plaintiff’s motion to disqualify counsel when it was agreed that counsel representing other defendants would argue on behalf of all defendants and committed no error in determining in what order motions should be heard. Motion judge did not err by proceeding with motions to strike on their merits without requiring fresh filing to deal with plaintiff’s amended statement of claim as defendants properly advised of their intention to proceed with motions after amended statement. There was no merit to plaintiff’s claim that his rights under Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms were violated. Plaintiff did not meet test for reasonable apprehension of bias, as motion judge did not manifest any partiality or bias. Plaintiff’s amended statement of claim was undoubtedly vexatious pleading that was properly struck for that reason.

Badawy v. 1038482 Alaberta Ltd. (2019), 2019 CarswellNat 2133, 2019 FCA 150, Eleanor R. Dawson J.A., Johanne Gauthier J.A., and Marianne Rivoalen J.A. (F.C.A.); affirmed (2018), 2018 CarswellNat 4076, 2018 CarswellNat 4422, 2018 FC 807, 2018 CF 807, Glennys L. McVeigh J. (F.C.).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit

Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from Law Times.

Recent articles & video

Amid enactment of sweeping law enforcement Bill C-75, LSO seeks status quo for students, paralegals

LSO must stand up for racialized licensees, says prospective returning bencher

OBA summit to bring together legal sector equality advocates

Federal government names Canadian Accessibility Standards Development Organization officers

Baker McKenzie adds senior tech strength to global M&A team

Alexander Holburn opens Toronto office

Most Read Articles

Appeal court ‘withdraws’ real estate decision after it was signed in error

Challenges continue for legal aid practitioners despite funding boost from Ottawa

Province should be cautious using ADR for domestic violence cases, say lawyers

Canadian law firms spending more on legal tech, says Thomson Reuters