Plaintiff’s amended statement of claim was undoubtedly vexatious pleading

Intellectual Property – Trademarks - Infringement

Plaintiff brought action against multiple defendants for trademark infringement. Defendants’ motions to strike out his statement of claim without leave to amend were granted while plaintiff’s motion for relief, including to disqualify counsel representing certain of defendants, was dismissed . Plaintiff appealed. Appeal dismissed. Plaintiff’s argument that motion judge should not have heard motions to strike must fail, as prior order had provided for motions to be dealt with during general sittings irrespective of appointment of case management judge. There was no merit to plaintiff’s contention that motion judge should have awaited appointment of case management judge. Motion judge was alive to plaintiff’s motion to disqualify counsel when it was agreed that counsel representing other defendants would argue on behalf of all defendants and committed no error in determining in what order motions should be heard. Motion judge did not err by proceeding with motions to strike on their merits without requiring fresh filing to deal with plaintiff’s amended statement of claim as defendants properly advised of their intention to proceed with motions after amended statement. There was no merit to plaintiff’s claim that his rights under Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms were violated. Plaintiff did not meet test for reasonable apprehension of bias, as motion judge did not manifest any partiality or bias. Plaintiff’s amended statement of claim was undoubtedly vexatious pleading that was properly struck for that reason.

Badawy v. 1038482 Alaberta Ltd. (2019), 2019 CarswellNat 2133, 2019 FCA 150, Eleanor R. Dawson J.A., Johanne Gauthier J.A., and Marianne Rivoalen J.A. (F.C.A.); affirmed (2018), 2018 CarswellNat 4076, 2018 CarswellNat 4422, 2018 FC 807, 2018 CF 807, Glennys L. McVeigh J. (F.C.).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Failure of Ontario to ‘conduct and manage’ online gaming makes iGaming system illegal, says lawsuit

OCA orders new trial for accused whose lawyer ‘conscripted him into assisting his own prosecution’

Ontario Securities Commission welcomes Kevan Cowan as new chair

LSO opens applications for Legal Aid Ontario board, federal judiciary advisory committee

Appeal from certification order in bread price-fixing class action quashed

Stay refused for mother seeking to relocate child from Milton to Sarnia

Most Read Articles

Court awards 24 months’ notice to Air Canada employee terminated as part of COVID layoff

OCA orders new trial for accused whose lawyer ‘conscripted him into assisting his own prosecution’

LSO Convocation approves license proposal for non-lawyer family legal services providers

Recent ruling a 'cautionary tale' for start-ups, says IP lawyer