Members not exercising judicial functions when they sit on Canadian Judicial Council

Quebec judge allegedly captured on video in process of purchasing illicit substance

Judges and courts | APPOINTMENT, REMOVAL, DISQUALIFICATION AND DISCIPLINE OF JUDGES AND OTHER COURT OFFICERS | Judicial councils

Applicant was Superior Court of Quebec judge . In 2012, complaint was filed against applicant when Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions informed Chief Justice that applicant had been identified by drug trafficker as former client . Applicant was allegedly captured on video in process of purchasing illicit substance. In 2014, Canadian Judicial Council (CJC) constituted inquiry committee in accordance with s. 63(4) of Judges Act (JA) to conduct full inquiry and while committee rejected all allegations against applicant, it tendered report to Minister about contradictions, inconsistencies and implausibilities in evidence during hearing . In 2016, second complaint was filed against applicant related to his lack of credibility in first inquiry, and second inquiry committee created report finding that applicant had become disabled from due execution of office by reason of misconduct related to first inquiry . Applicant brought applications for judicial review . CJC unsuccessfully brought motions to strike applications for judicial review on basis of lack of jurisdiction . CJC appealed . Appeal dismissed. Reports and recommendations of CJC and its committees were subject to judicial review. CJC and its committees were included in definition of “federal board, commission or other tribunal” in section 2 of Federal Courts Act and CJC was not subject to any exception . While some members were appointed under Constitution Act, they were not exercising judicial functions when they sit on CJC. Possibility of reviewing legality of CJC’s decisions contributed to maintenance of rule of law and supervisory power exercised by Federal Court over CJC played important public interest role.

Canada (Conseil de la magistrature) c. Girouard (2019), 2019 CarswellNat 2009, 2019 CAF 148, J.D. Denis Pelletier J.A., Yves de Montigny J.A., and Mary J.L. Gleason J.A. (F.C.A.); affirmed (2018), 2018 CarswellNat 5088, 2018 CarswellNat 5089, 2018 FC 865, 2018 CF 865, Simon Noël J. (F.C.).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Criminal Lawyers’ Association filling mentor-gap with new online educational series

OBA's taxation law section names first female chairperson, Angela Salvatore

COVID-19 Economic Recovery Act to amend Justices of the Peace Act and Provincial Offences Act

OHRC tells Sudbury landlords they cannot discriminate based on receipt of public assistance

Windsor’s new associate dean to advance Indigenous law in legal education

Ontario and Superior Courts of Justice embark on first phase of reopening

Most Read Articles

Canadian Constitution Foundation suggests amendments to mandatory mask order in Ontario

Windsor’s new associate dean to advance Indigenous law in legal education

Ontario and Superior Courts of Justice embark on first phase of reopening

Patricia Kosseim shares her priorities as the new information and privacy commissioner