Crown Consultation and Accommodation Report was provided to Governor in Council, publicly disclosed

Aboriginal and Indigenous Law – Indigenous rights to natural resources and environmental protections – Rights to protection and consultation

In 2016, Governor in Council decided to approve Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion Project (“project”). Several Indigenous Bands successfully challenged this approval and it was found that Crown had failed to fulfill its duty to consult with Indigenous peoples. Reconsideration hearing took place in front of National Energy Board (NEB) and Governor in Council approved project for second time. Several parties sought to challenge second approval on environmental grounds and on grounds of Crown's alleged continued failure to fulfill its duty to consult, but only four applicants continued with application. Parties brought application for judicial review under s. 55 of National Energy Board Act, challenging second approval of Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion Project. Application dismissed. There was no basis for interfering with Governor in Council's second authorization of project. Governor in Council reinitiated consultations directly with potentially affected Indigenous groups and retained recognized expert with extensive experience in Indigenous matters to oversee and provide guidance. Significantly, consultation process initiated by Canada invited participation of 129 Indigenous groups potentially impacted by project, and in end, more than 120 either supported it or did not oppose it. Governor in Council explained that in end, detailed Crown Consultation and Accommodation Report (CCAR) was provided to all members of Governor in Council and was publicly disclosed, including to Indigenous groups.

Coldwater First Nation v. Canada (Attorney General) (2020), 2020 CarswellNat 215, 2020 CarswellNat 216, 2020 FCA 34, 2020 CAF 34, Marc Noël C.J., J.D. Denis Pelletier J.A., and J.B. Laskin J.A. (F.C.A.).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca

Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Relocation disputes surge in family law litigation, says Lerners LLP’s Ryan McNeil

Ont. CA confirms future harm risk not compensable in contaminated medication class action

Law Commission of Ontario announces new board of governors appointments

Ontario Superior Court upholds ‘fair dealing’ in franchise dispute

Ontario Superior Court orders retrial for catastrophic impairment case due to procedural unfairness

LEAF celebrates 39 years fighting gender-based discrimination at annual Evening for Equality gala

Most Read Articles

Ontario Superior Court confirms License Appeal Tribunal cannot award punitive damages

Ontario Court of Appeal denies builder's request for a trial on damages in a real estate dispute

Ontario Superior Court grants extension for service of expert reports in medical negligence case

Ontario Superior Court denies late motion to transfer car accident case to simplified procedure