Applicants' argument that their removal in absence of risk assessment violated the Charter failed

Federal appeal | Immigration and Citizenship | Refugee protection | Removal

Refugee Protection Division found that applicants committed crimes against humanity and were excluded from protection under s. 98 of Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA). As directed by s. 113(d) of IRPA, pre-removal risk assessment (PRRA) officer conducted restricted PRRA, with respect to s. 97 grounds alone. Officer determined applicants did not meet threshold required to stay removal orders. Federal Court dismissed application for judicial review. Applicants appealed. Appeal dismissed. Coherence and consistency in interpretation of scheme supported conclusion that PRRA officer had no jurisdiction to reconsider prior exclusion finding. Subsections 112(3) and (c) of IRPA did not require Minister, when conducting PRRA, to confirm that there remained substantive basis for excluding applicant from refugee protection. Applicants' argument that their removal in absence of risk assessment under s. 96 criteria violated s. 7 of Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms failed on basis of established Supreme Court jurisprudence with respect to interface between s. 7 of Charter and exclusion findings. Applicants' s. 7 Charter rights were protected by safeguards available to them under IRPA. Minister was not required to exercise discretion under s. 25.2 of IRPA to exempt applicants from application of s. 112(3), such that failure to consider their request for exemption vitiated PRRA decision. PRRA officer's decision was not shown to be unreasonable.

Tapambwa v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) (2019), 2019 CarswellNat 403, 2019 FCA 34, David Stratas J.A., Donald J. Rennie J.A., and Judith Woods J.A. (F.C.A.); affirmed (2017), 2017 CarswellNat 2495, 2017 CarswellNat 2496, 2017 FC 522, 2017 CF 522, Richard F. Southcott J. (F.C.).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca.


Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from Law Times.

Recent articles & video

Open schedule at Competition Tribunal presents opportunity for commissioner, lawyer says

Students raise alarm on future of university legal clinics

CICB to cease accepting applications on Oct. 1

Stikeman Elliott, Rubin Thomlinson, McCarthy Tétrault win HR awards

Insurance lawyers reveal their referral philosophies

Court of Appeal rules auto insurer not liable for parental negligence claim stemming from accident

Most Read Articles

New equality measure approved by Law Society of Ontario as the statement of principles gets repealed

Judges call out lack of support for legal aid, pro bono amid MAG presence

Chasm in opinions remains after statement of principles repeal

Law students, paralegals can continue working on the same summary conviction matters