Skip to content

Harassment and discrimination complaints skyrocket

|Written By Anita Balakrishnan
Harassment and discrimination complaints skyrocket
Jennifer Gold says a jump in calls to the Discrimination and Harassment Counsel for the Law Society of Ontario are a wake-up call for the profession. Photo: Robin Kuniski

There was a 50-per-cent uptick in the first half of 2018 in the total number of new individuals who contacted the Discrimination and Harassment Counsel for the Law Society of Ontario, according to a report released by the law society’s Equity and Indigenous Affairs Committee.

The report shows that 125 individuals — or about 21 per month — reached out to the DHC for a new matter, a leap from about 14 per month in the last six months of 2017. Behaviour that is described in the report includes discriminatory advertising for articling positions, persistent sexualized and predatory texting, verbal or physical threats, clients being mocked by opposing counsel due to a disability, and demanding sex in exchange for legal services, among others.

Jennifer Gold, a family lawyer and founding partner of a boutique firm that serves the Region of Peel, says the report is a wake-up call for the profession.

“Unfortunately, it wasn’t surprising,” says Gold, who is vice president of the Women’s Law Association of Ontario. “I think we all know that these things are happening and finally they are coming to light.”

Racial discrimination was the most common grounds of complaint amid legal professionals, followed by sexual harassment, sex, and disability, with most complainants raising more than one issue, the report said. Sexual harassment was the most common complaint among members of the public, followed by disability discrimination complaints.

Of the 125 new contacts — excluding those calling about existing issues — 46 were “substantive concerns about discrimination and/or harassment by licensees that fall within the mandate of the DHC program,” including 11 by members of the public and 34 by members of the legal profession, the report said.

Of those 46 complaints within the DHC mandate, 24 were made by lawyers, seven were made by students and three were made by paralegals. Eighty per cent of the claims made by members of the legal profession were made by women, “more than half of whom voluntarily self-identified as racialized women and/or women with disabilities.” Of the six men that complained within the legal profession, five identified as being racialized, gay, of a minority religion or as a man with a disability, the report said.

The DHC provides free, confidential services to those with concerns or complaints about discrimination or harassment that violates the Ontario Human Rights Code and is committed by lawyers or paralegals licensed in Ontario or by students in the Ontario licensing process, the report said.

While the DHC is funded by the law society, the operations are completely independent and the data provided to the law society is completely anonymized, and there is no way to know which complaints proceed to civil or criminal actions or law society tribunal cases, says Lai-King Hum, one of the lawyers that works on the DHC.

The counsel doesn’t provide legal services, but it does suggest other remedies.

Gold recalled attending an International Women’s Day event in March 2018, when a panel discussed whether the #MeToo movement would affect lawyers.

Hum, who spoke on the panel on March 13 at Osgoode Hall, says complaints spiked after the talk, which had about 300 people in attendance and more watching online.

Advertisements in ORs and emails from the law society have also raised the visibility of the DHC’s resources, she says.

“What was missing was the ability to cite data to say, ‘There is a problem.’ To date, there was anecdotal evidence,” Hum says. “I don’t think people know that there is an issue in the profession.”

Dianne Corbiere, managing partner of Nahwegahbow Corbiere Genoodmagejig Barristers & Solicitors, chairs the LSO’s Equity and Indigenous Affairs Committee, which presented the DHC statistics to law society members. 

“I want to make sure that we continue to take this issue seriously and do what we can, change where we can and improve where we can,” Corbiere says.

Erin Durant, who practises insurance defence litigation and labour and employment law as a senior associate at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP in Ottawa, says that having more diversity among law firm leadership, as well as more diversity and inclusion training, may also have emboldened people to reach out to the DHC.

“I have been confused as an assistant, a court reporter and a law clerk before,” Durant says.

“I have never experienced discrimination from a colleague, in any firm that I’ve been at. More often when I have seen gender stereotypes applied, it has been from actors outside the law: clients, court staff, sometimes legal assistants and often in jurisdictions where there may not be as many women lawyers.”

  • Really? This is your take on the Issue?

    Not wet behind the ears
    As this issue has come up yet again (in my practice and as a practicing lawyer), I decided to do some further reading on the topic, and this article came up. Yes, it is 6 months old, but I want to become better informed to see if there were new, innovative ways to address such matters. I am truly happy that Ms. Durant has not experienced experienced discrimination (or presumably harassment or she would have said so) in her 6 years at the bar. In my first 6 years, I had to sit through a "good ol' boy" put his arm around me, 'friend to friend' (this was the first time I had met him) and suggest that he and I should just agree on a dismissal of my client's claims and not waste any more time. I am sure my senior partner would not have been too pleased if I had been swayed by this very senior lawyer's pressure. Also during my first 6 years, the same senior partner subjected me to ongoing sexual harassment that tipped over into sexual assault. No it was not reported. The firm culture made that impossible. When I finally and firmly rejected his unwanted advances by pushing him off me and removing his hand from inside my blouse, he resolved the problem of the awkward tension between us by firmly and unapologetically requesting my dismissal when I went on maternity leave (how uppity was I for having the temerity to get pregnant before I made partner!). I was, to his disappointment, allowed to take my maternity leave (4 months, not 12), before I was ushered to the door. I am confident I was not the first, nor the last woman to be the subject of unwanted advances. This partner left the large firm where we practiced and now enjoys his position as a Superior Court Justice. It is evident from the LSO's report and increase in calls that the problem has not gone away. You spoke to senior lawyers in the profession, all of whom would appear to know that these practices are widespread, but remarkably did not find one who would admit to or describe a personal discriminatory or harassing event they experienced. The women and minorities in law are 'woke' and have been for a very long time. Please do not include my name or email address. While an avid supporter of the "Me Too" movement for obvious reasons, I have not made disclosure beyond this comment.

Law Times Poll

A group of benchers opposed to the Statement of Principles will need to win the support of their colleagues to repeal the requirement. Do you think they will be successful in repealing the statement of principles in the coming year?