Skip to content

Former lawyer continues 30-year battle with RCMP

|Written By Marg. Bruineman

Paul Temelini isn’t letting bygones be bygones. After all, he says, he lost a profitable law practice because RCMP officers didn’t do their jobs properly when they charged him with fraud 30 years ago.

Sudbury MP Glenn Thibeault has been supporting former lawyer Paul Temelini in his battle with the federal government.
“The law society said I could go back, but go back to what?” asks the Sudbury, Ont., real estate developer and former lawyer.

“As a lawyer or doctor or a professional person, you can’t go back. They destroyed me. A lawyer charged with fraud is no longer capable of practising law.”

The story goes all the way back to 1982 when Temelini was charged with six counts of fraud. He agreed not to practise law while the charges were pending.

Two years later, he beat the charges and a real estate agent pleaded guilty to one of the them. But by then, he says, the damage had been done. The situation decimated the practice he had built up over the previous 15 years.

So he sued. All of these years later, the lawsuit involving the RCMP and what was then the Canada Permanent Trust Co. remains ongoing.

Temelini suspects it could well be among the country’s oldest unresolved cases still before the courts. When asked about the lack of a resolution, an RCMP media relations officer suggests posing the question to the courts instead.

In the meantime, Temelini refuses to give up. He has a new lawyer who’s working on contingency, meaning Temelini no longer has to incur the legal costs directly.

He’s pushing forward with his fight in other ways as well. Beside the lawsuit, he has circulated a petition asking the federal government to help bring his dispute closer to some sort of a resolution.

He’s also asking the government to modernize the legislation governing the RCMP to ensure that others like him are able to challenge the actions of a federal police force he claims is acting “in contravention to modern protocols of harassment and discrimination.”

Sudbury MP Glenn Thibeault has decided Temelini’s cause is worth going to bat for. In 2009, Thibeault met with and encouraged the then-RCMP commissioner to bring some sort of a conclusion to Temelini’s 30-year battle.

This year, he’s taking Temelini’s petition to the House of Commons.

“I do what I can for Paul as I would for any of my constituents,” says Thibeault, an NDP MP first elected in 2008. “I have a constituent who has a legitimate concern . . . and I support him in any way I can.”

Thibeault expects to bring the petition forward in the coming weeks. The government has 45 sitting house days to respond, so Thibeault expects some sort of an answer by December.

Early in his career while practising law, Temelini also invested in real estate. But it was his work as a lawyer that was at the core of the 1982 fraud charges against him.

He had been involved in the purchase and sale of numerous properties in Sudbury while acting mostly for the vendors but also for some of the purchasers.

In dismissing the charges against Temelini in 1984, judge M.J. Fortier said he had serious doubts that Temelini’s actions in the transactions should result in criminal sanctions. Temelini should have the benefit of that doubt, the judge ruled.

His multimillion-dollar lawsuit, originally launched in 1985, was for malicious prosecution of the 1982 charges.

He’s suing Canada Permanent Trust, now TD Canada Trust, for breaching client confidentiality by illegally providing the RCMP with his business and financial information in the early 1980s.

Temelini maintains he was the victim of a set-up and says police should never have charged him based on the information they had collected.

As a result, he says, his law practice suffered and he had trouble attracting financing and clientele for his business interests. Cash-flow problems followed and then the creditors came along.

“They chose to ignore what wouldn’t fit into their theory,” he says.

Since launching the lawsuit, he says he has faced roadblocks, obstruction, and interference that have resulted in delays. He hopes, then, that his efforts in Parliament through Thibeault will help. “The government is mandated to answer this," says Thibeault.

  • Jordan Murray
    Mr. Temelini you are not alone. I was deemed "unsuitable for employment" by a Detachment Commander who chose to hear only evidence that supported her agenda. An independent investigation conducted by a highly respected investigator/ lawyer hired by the City I worked for exonerated me. You would have thought that would have solved the issue and I would have gotten my job back... nope the RCMP continued to support the Detachment Commander even though there were numerous allegations of harassment and bullying of not only city employee's but members as well by this same Detachment Commander. To make matters worse the RCMP document that defamed me was leaked to the local news paper by two disgruntled employee's. Since when does an RCMP document get leaked and no investigation is conducted by them? My educated guess would be when they have something to hide. I hope justice prevails...justice in Canada appears to be only for those who can afford it. I unfortunately can't.
  • Cheryl Simes
    I empathise. I am a New Zealand lawyer. My practice was destroyed in early 2010 when the Legal Services Agency cancelled my legal-aid approvals. Their decision was seriously flawed. The High Court ruled in my favour. They appealed. The Court of Appeal is about to rule. Meanwhile they made a complaint to the Law Society. The Standards Committee assumed the complaint had merit, without properly investigating. They charged me with misconduct. How do you promote yourself to private clients while facing misconduct charges? Two years later the charges were dismissed by the Disciplinary Tribunal. We are waiting for the Tribunal to rule on costs, because we did not reach agreement on the extent to which my legal fees for defending the charges should be reimbursed. I wish Temelini well, because there is a principle which needs to be recognised.
cover image

DIGITAL EDITION

Subscribers get early and easy access to Law Times.

Law Times Poll


Law Times reports that the Correctional Service Canada has been found to be negligent in the severe beating of an inmate. Do you think inmate safety at jails and prisons needs significant improvement?
RESULTS ❯