Poll Results


An Ontario judge has ordered plaintiffs to post more than $900,000 in security for costs to Chevron Corporation and a subsidiary. Do you agree with the judge's ruling?
Voting for this poll has ended
Total Votes: 68
Poll Results
Yes, the plaintiffs have failed to show their claim is not devoid of merit.
No, the judge failed to consider the novelty and public importance of the action.
Start Voting: 10/10/2017|End Voting: 10/16/2017

Recent Polls


Law Times Poll


A group of benchers opposed to the Statement of Principles will need to win the support of their colleagues to repeal the requirement. Do you think they will be successful in repealing the statement of principles in the coming year?
RESULTS ❯