Supreme Court


Sentence

PRINCIPLES
Precluding credit for unavailability of remission would be incompatible with parity principle

Accused pleading guilty to manslaughter in shaking death of infant daughter. Accused spending 10 months in pretrial custody. Crown at sentencing acknowledging accused likely candidate for early parole. Trial judge giving 1.5:1 credit due solely to unavailability of remission and parole eligibility while on remand. Court of Appeal upholding trial judge’s conclusion that s. 719(3) of Criminal Code permits enhanced credit solely for loss of opportunity of early release. Crown appeal dismissed. Nothing in language of s. 719(3) limits scope of “circumstances” that may justify enhanced credit for pretrial custody. Precluding credit for unavailability of remission would be incompatible with parity principle.

R. v. Summers (Apr. 11, 2014, S.C.C., McLachlin C.J.C., LeBel J., Abella J., Rothstein J., Cromwell J., Karakatsanis J., and Wagner J., File No. 35339) Decision at 105 W.C.B. (2d) 789 was affirmed.  112 W.C.B. (2d) 393.

cover image

DIGITAL EDITION

Subscribers get early and easy access to Law Times.

Law Times Poll


Ontario’s provincial government said it will use both the courts and the legislature to cut the size of Toronto’s city council ahead of an Oct. 22 election. Do you think lawyers' efforts to stop this move will be successful?
RESULTS ❯