Ontario Criminal


Constitutional Law

COURTS
Judge had no jurisdiction to declare that Koran was supreme law

Application by accused CE for order that applicable law for trial should be Koran and not Criminal Code. Accused RJ and CE were charged with various terrorism-related offences. RJ retained counsel and CE was self-represented. CE refused to be represented because he would not be represented by any counsel who accepted Criminal Code and not Koran as governing law for trial. He was unable to find counsel who would agree with this position. Application dismissed. Judge had no jurisdiction to declare that Koran was supreme law for purposes of Canadian criminal trial. He was bound to uphold Constitution as supreme law of Canada and to uphold rule of law as part of that Constitution.

R. v. Jaser (Jun. 26, 2014, Ont. S.C.J., M.A. Code J., File No. CR-13-10000655-0000) 120 W.C.B. (2d) 339.

cover image

DIGITAL EDITION

Subscribers get early and easy access to Law Times.

Law Times Poll


Law Times reports that there is no explicit rule that lawyers in Ontario must be competent in the use of technology. Do you think there should be explicit rules spelling out the expectations of lawyers’ in terms of tech use in their practice?
RESULTS ❯