Ontario Criminal

Charter of Rights

Breach of rights was extremely serious and reflected pattern of systemic neglect

Accused charged with first degree murder. Accused arrested late at night on weekend following shooting. Police interviewed accused following afternoon rather than taking them to court. Officers testified that they believed weekend bail court would be closed. Officer in charge forgot to call justice of peace to attend station and remand accused. Accused applied to exclude statements on basis that they were not brought before justice within 24 hours. Crown conceded that accuseds’ s. 9 Charter right was violated but argued that statements should be admitted pursuant to s. 24(2). Application allowed and statement excluded. Breach of accuseds’ right was extremely serious and reflected pattern of systemic neglect of Charter rights. Police disregarded clear requirements of Criminal Code. Statements were not important part of Crown’s case. Admission of statements would bring administration of justice into disrepute.

R. v. Mendez (Jan. 22, 2014, Ont. S.C.J., M. Forestell J., File No. 12-30000346-0000) 111 W.C.B. (2d) 442.

cover image


Subscribers get early and easy access to Law Times.

Law Times Poll

Law Times reports that there is no explicit rule that lawyers in Ontario must be competent in the use of technology. Do you think there should be explicit rules spelling out the expectations of lawyers’ in terms of tech use in their practice?