Ontario Criminal


Appeal from refusal to strike pleas dismissed

Accused appealed from her plea of guilty to two charges of fraud and one charge of uttering forged document. Fraud charges related to credit applications made to banks. Uttering charge involved forged documents used to obtain passport for accused’s daughter. Accused had pleaded guilty to same charges some four years earlier and successfully moved to strike those pleas. Matter then proceeded through courts until second guilty pleas were entered in January 2014. Five months later, accused again moved to strike her guilty pleas but this time her motion failed. Accused appealed from refusal to strike pleas. Appeal dismissed. Trial judge found accused to be articulate and smart and had no doubt but that accused knew exactly what she was doing when she pleaded guilty and she knew consequences of her action. Trial judge did not observe any reluctance to engage in plea process whatsoever at time it was taken. Trial judge’s observations were fully warranted on record.

R. v. Kirpichova (Sep. 17, 2015, Ont. C.A., Doherty J.A., M.H. Tulloch J.A., and Grant Huscroft J.A., File No. CA C58952) 124 W.C.B. (2d) 542.

cover image


Subscribers get early and easy access to Law Times.

Law Times Poll

Law Times reports that there is no explicit rule that lawyers in Ontario must be competent in the use of technology. Do you think there should be explicit rules spelling out the expectations of lawyers’ in terms of tech use in their practice?