Federal Court


Immigration

INADMISSIBLE AND REMOVABLE CLASSES
Board failed to apply facts of crime to Canadian criminal law

Respondent was found to be refugee. Respondent was found not to be excluded despite lengthy record of criminal convictions in United States. Minister’s application for judicial review was allowed. Board failed to apply principles set out in case law. Board failed to apply facts of crime to Canadian criminal law. Board looked for equivalent criminal provisions to those of United States offences. Board erred in consideration of contextual matters. Finding on issue of well-founded fear was unduly brief and did not touch on credibility. Reasons were not adequate.


Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Diaz

(June 21, 2011, F.C., Phelan J., File No. IMM-4878-10) 204 A.C.W.S. (3d) 125 (8 pp.).

cover image

DIGITAL EDITION

Subscribers get early and easy access to Law Times.

Law Times Poll


Law Times reports that there is no explicit rule that lawyers in Ontario must be competent in the use of technology. Do you think there should be explicit rules spelling out the expectations of lawyers’ in terms of tech use in their practice?
RESULTS ❯