Source of payment not pertinent for purposes of s. 36(9) of Employment Insurance Regulations

Federal appeal | Public Law | Social programs | Employment insurance

Employee’s appeal to Appeal Division of Social Security Tribunal was dismissed. Employee applied for judicial review to Federal Court of Appeal. Application dismissed. Decision of Appeal Division of Social Security Tribunal was reasonable. Source of payment not pertinent for purposes of s. 36(9) of Employment Insurance Regulations, only that it was paid by reason of layoff. Indemnity became payable as of date of layoff when employee became unemployed.

Champagne c. Canada (Procureur général) (2018), 2018 CarswellNat 1914, 2018 CAF 79, Nadon J.A., Richard Boivin J.A., and de Montigny J.A. (F.C.A.).


Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from Law Times.

Recent articles & video

Alexander Holburn opens Toronto office

Comic book helps newcomers find legal resources

Burford Capital makes governance change ahead of US IPO plan

Appeal court ‘withdraws’ real estate decision after it was signed in error

Challenges continue for legal aid practitioners despite funding boost from Ottawa

Orlando Da Silva to receive Youth Mental Health Hero Award

Most Read Articles

Appeal court ‘withdraws’ real estate decision after it was signed in error

Former Bennett Jones partner Hugo Alves to become CEO of cannabis firm Auxly

Province should be cautious using ADR for domestic violence cases, say lawyers

Challenges continue for legal aid practitioners despite funding boost from Ottawa