Claimant not “particular individual” under s. 254 of Excise Tax Act, can’t claim housing rebate

Tax - Goods and services tax - Rebates

Claimant real estate agent signed agreement to purchase new condominium unit from developer as co-purchaser with claimant’s nephew. Claimant had trust declaration prepared to show that she and her husband held title in trust for nephew so he could qualify for mortgage. Minister of National Revenue denied claimant’s GST/HST new housing rebate application on basis that claimant did not meet requirement of acquiring property for use as primary place of residence of “particular individual” or relation of particular individual. Claimant appealed on ground that she acted on behalf of nephew as his agent or trustee in acquiring new home. Tax Court judge allowed appeal. Judge held that, while claimant was not “particular individual”, nephew, as principal of agency relationship, was “particular individual” and satisfied occupancy requirements. Minister appealed. Appeal allowed. It was error of law to find that claimant who was not “particular individual” under s. 254 of Excise Tax Act (ETA) was eligible to claim new housing rebate. Claimant did not intend to, and did not actually, occupy home as her place of residence, so she was not “particular individual” for purpose of s. 254(2) of ETA. Nephew did intend to reside in home so it was critical question whether he was relation of claimant. As result of ss. 254(1) and 126(2) of ETA, and ss. 251(2) and 251(6) of Income Tax Act (ITA), nephew was not related to aunt or uncle, so nephew was not relation of claimant. Claimant was not entitled to claim new housing rebate and her appeal was dismissed.

Canada v. Ngai (2019), 2019 CarswellNat 2742, 2019 FCA 181, Johanne Gauthier J.A., Wyman W. Webb J.A., and Marianne Rivoalen J.A. (F.C.A.); reversed (2017), 2017 CarswellNat 2216, 2017 TCC 79, B. Russell J. (T.C.C. [Informal Procedure]).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca

Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from Law Times.

Recent articles & video

Ford government’s cuts to Toronto city council ruled constitutional

Histories of Canadian law and Métis people are entwined, says Jean Teillet

More women are on TSX company boards - but there’s slow progress to the C-Suite, says Osler

GM lawyer Michael Smith becomes partner at Bennett Jones

Ontario court rules cap on general damages does not apply to sexual abuse

House of Commons reveals legal fee reimbursement over $54k

Most Read Articles

Ontario court rules cap on general damages does not apply to sexual abuse

Man discharged from his fourth bankruptcy

Insurance lawyers reveal their referral philosophies

Court of Appeal rules auto insurer not liable for parental negligence claim stemming from accident