Skip to content

Editorial: Bold move by CBA

The Canadian Bar Association came out with a bold set of recommendations with its Legal Futures report last week.

While the report focuses on innovation across the legal profession, the key aspect for many people was, of course, the proposed liberalization around alternative business structures. Among the suggestions was to allow such structures, including multidisciplinary partnerships, that could deliver both legal and non-legal services. As part of the reforms, the report suggests allowing for the payment of referral fees to non-lawyers.

The recommendations, which come amid growing pressure to shake up the profession, include several provisions to permit alternative business structures “but only on a carefully regulated basis.” The protections include subjecting such arrangements to law society entity regulation; applying the confidentiality, conflicts, and candour rules; and continuing to regulate lawyers working in alternative business structures as individuals. In addition, the proposals would see compliance-based regulation for law firms with a requirement to designate a lawyer responsible for overseeing regulatory compliance. The report includes a long list of other regulatory changes aimed at ensuring protection of the public under the proposed new framework in which non-lawyers would be able to invest in or own law firms.

Given the need to allow for greater innovation in the legal field, the recommendations are welcome. As outgoing CBA president Fred Headon noted last week, outside ownership and investment are key to making innovation more feasible and cost-effective. The barriers, of course, are many, including the fact that each province has its own legal regulator that would have to move on the proposals. There’s sure to be significant resistance, so it’s easy to see how we could face a patchwork situation where some legal regulators are willing to move on the reforms while others are saying no.

That will create some problems and barriers, but as we’ve seen with the political and legal wrangling around a national securities regulator, that’s the reality in Canada. Headon, meanwhile, hopes working with the Federation of Law Societies of Canada will help smooth out some of those issues. The CBA report, then, is a great contribution to the debate that should move the innovation and reform issues significantly forward.

Glenn Kauth

For more, see "'Dramatic changes' on tap as CBA report touts outside ownership" and "Embracing reform."

  • S F
    I do wonder how it will in any way broaden access to justice to have non-productive shareholders sucking up clients' funds at the top, without any personal stake in the profession and a motive to generate as much profit as possible.

    If you think the legal profession is shut off from competition now, just wait until a few giant corporations are running the show. Lawyers will be wage slaves and clients will be as pilfered from as ever. The only winners will be big institutional investors.
  • Will Hiscock
    The innovation isn't needed in the legal profession and is not for the benefit of lawyers or their clients. It is banks and big business who are demanding these changes and they will lead to less control by lawyers and greater pressures to work in unethical ways. The only people who should own law firms are the people working there.
  • Andres B
    I can already imagine all the wonderful scenarios that will occur when management demands the lawyer do something which in their own subjective opinion contravenes ethics requirements. Such organizations will obviously gravitate towards the kind of workforce that feels less need to (or understands the end consequence of) injecting their need to abide by the code of professional conduct into everything.

Law Times Poll

A lawyer recently told Law Times that there hasn’t been clear guidance from the courts on the issue of unlocking a phone at an airport or a border, if border officers wish to examine it. Do you wipe all information off of your devices before your travel outside Canada?