Petty position

There’s an old adage: If you argue for your limitations, you get to keep them. I was reminded of this phrase recently as controversy trickled up about a statement of principles lawyers will be required to sign. The issue is, admittedly, complex.

There’s an old adage: If you argue for your limitations, you get to keep them.

I was reminded of this phrase recently as controversy trickled up about a statement of principles lawyers will be required to sign. The issue is, admittedly, complex.

All licensed lawyers and paralegals will be required to write and sign a statement of principles acknowledging their obligation to promote equality, diversity and inclusion.

For some, this feels insulting, controlling or overbearing and is tantamount to having their thoughts policed.

It pains me to say those complaining about this requirement are, in some ways, technically correct and the requirement may slightly overstep in terms of requiring people to adopt and abide by the principles, without more detail on how such goals can be implemented.

Therefore, the document’s detractors are correct: Requiring people to have a statement of principles will not mean people actually work to promote diversity. People don’t like feeling forced to do things.

However, the spirit of the document persists — issues around diversity in the profession (which are, in my view, very well placed) have never been under closer scrutiny.

Therefore, those kicking up a fuss about ticking a box are choosing to complain about a process that takes minimal time and minimal effort. How I wish they had taken the time to complain about this to improve diversity within their own firms or listen to other lawyers’ experiences, as well as foster more positive, open dialogue about how to improve the situation.

People are allowed to take stands on issues that matter to them. But if history has taught us anything, it’s that listening to others should be the first step. An insurrection of a me-first attitude is depressing, dis-spiriting and, frankly, makes the profession look petty. For shame. For absolute shame.              



Free newsletter

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Ontario Superior Court confirms License Appeal Tribunal cannot award punitive damages

Ontario Superior Court grants extension for service of expert reports in medical negligence case

Ontario Court of Appeal denies builder's request for a trial on damages in a real estate dispute

Liberal MPP’s bill aims to ‘depoliticize’ and clear backlog from Ontario’s tribunal system

Ontario Superior Court awards damages after real estate deals fail due to broker's conflicting roles

Ontario Superior Court rejects jury trial in motor vehicle accident case due to procedural delays

Most Read Articles

Liberal MPP’s bill aims to ‘depoliticize’ and clear backlog from Ontario’s tribunal system

Ontario Superior Court awards damages after real estate deals fail due to broker's conflicting roles

Ontario Superior Court rejects jury trial in motor vehicle accident case due to procedural delays

Ontario Court of Appeal denies builder's request for a trial on damages in a real estate dispute