Poll Results


An Ontario judge has ordered plaintiffs to post more than $900,000 in security for costs to Chevron Corporation and a subsidiary. Do you agree with the judge's ruling?
Voting for this poll has ended
Total Votes: 68
Poll Results
Yes, the plaintiffs have failed to show their claim is not devoid of merit.
No, the judge failed to consider the novelty and public importance of the action.
Start Voting: 10/10/2017|End Voting: 10/16/2017

Recent Polls


cover image

DIGITAL EDITION

Subscribers get early and easy access to Law Times.

Law Times Poll


A Law Society of Ontario tribunal has ruled that a lawyer charged with offences related to child pornography should not be subject to an interlocutory suspension. Do you agree with this decision?
RESULTS ❯