Supreme Court


Defences

GENERAL
Accused abandoned common intention to kill children but failed to neutralize her participation

Accused charged with being party, together with her spouse, to murder of their three children. Appropriate for trial judge to exclude defence of abandonment from defences put to jury as defence did not have air of reality. While accused abandoned common intention to kill children, she failed to do anything to neutralize her participation, by supplying intoxicants used by her spouse to kill children, in murder plot.

R. c. Gauthier (Jun. 7, 2013, S.C.C., LeBel J., Fish J., Abella J., Rothstein J., Moldaver J., Karakatsanis J., and Wagner J., File No. 34444) 108 W.C.B. (2d) 793.

cover image

DIGITAL EDITION

Subscribers get early and easy access to Law Times.

Law Times Poll


An Ontario lawyer says that solicitor-client privilege may be threatened by a master’s decision that barred him from representing his own firm in a dispute over a wrongful dismissal claim. Do you agree with the lawyer's assessment?
RESULTS ❯