Ontario Criminal


Evidence

WITNESSES
Complainant’s prior statements never tendered in evidence

Accused charged with assaults, sexual assaults and threats against three former romantic partners. Accused’s recent partner testified that accused had repeatedly punched her in the back of the head, had assaulted her with a telephone and a chair and had forced her to perform oral sex. Two other former partners testified to various sexual assaults, assaults and threats. Accused testified and denied all allegations. Trial judge accepted evidence of recent partner in reliance on its consistency with her prior statement to police and testimony at preliminary inquiry. Appeal allowed and new trial ordered on those counts. Complainant’s prior statements were never tendered in evidence. Trial judge erred in law by basing verdict on evidence not adduced at trial.


R. v. Smith

(Aug. 26, 2011, Ont. C.A., Weiler, Blair and Epstein JJ.A., File No. C50528) 96 W.C.B. (2d) 352 (27 pp.).

cover image

DIGITAL EDITION

Subscribers get early and easy access to Law Times.

Law Times Poll


A report is making waves because it reveals statistics about composition of juries in two Eastern Ontario regions, which lawyers say show how the system can be biased. Do you believe Ontario juries are representative of all the people who come before the court?
RESULTS ❯