Ontario Criminal


Charter of Rights


Accused failed to establish breach of right to silence

RIGHT TO COUNSEL

Accused failed to establish breach of right to silence

Crown brought application for ruling that videotaped statement given by accused to detective was voluntary. Accused applied for ruling that his rights under ss. 7 and 10(b) under Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms violated. Crown application granted. Accused was advised of his right to silence before made admissions. Accused failed to establish breach of right to silence. Accused was given opportunity to speak with lawyer at each relevant point. Accused failed to establish breach of right to counsel. Even if there had been breach statements would have not been excluded. State’s conduct was not serious, statement was voluntary and reliable, and those factors weighed in favour of admission.

R. v. Cubacub (Aug. 1, 2012, Ont. S.C.J., Ricchetti J., File No. CRIMJ(P) 937/17) 102 W.C.B. (2d) 141 (22 pp.).

cover image

DIGITAL EDITION

Subscribers get early and easy access to Law Times.

Professional Development


Law Times Poll


A Law Times column argues it’s time for provincial laws dedicated to stopping defamatory publications on the Internet. Do you think that new legislation will help counter defamatory statements online?
RESULTS ❯