Federal Court


Aboriginal Peoples

SELF-GOVERNMENT
Public interest considerations favoured status quo pending hearing

At meeting committee purportedly removed applicants from office of chief and council. Applicants brought motion for interim injunction staying effect of meeting of committee and prohibiting holding of elections for chief and councillors pending final determination of application for judicial review. Application was allowed on terms set out. There was serious issue to be tried. Applicants would suffer irreparable harm if relief sought were not granted. Removal of applicants from office jeopardized exercise of responsibility for governance. Balance of convenience favoured applicants. Applicants were elected for two-year term. Applicants continuing in office pending judicial review maintained status quo. Public interest considerations favoured status quo pending hearing. Respondents’ request for adjournment was refused. Applicants’ request for expedited hearing of notice of motion was twice refused to provide respondents with full notice period and opportunity to respond. Respondents were fully acquainted with facts. Respondents’ request for adjournment was previously heard and refused by case management judge. Respondents were on notice to be ready to proceed.

Napaokesik v. Shamattawa First Nation Membership Committee

(Feb. 3, 2012, F.C., Mandamin J., File No. T-73-12) 211 A.C.W.S. (3d) 744 (15 pp.).

cover image

DIGITAL EDITION

Subscribers get early and easy access to Law Times.

Law Times Poll


A report is making waves because it reveals statistics about composition of juries in two Eastern Ontario regions, which lawyers say show how the system can be biased. Do you believe Ontario juries are representative of all the people who come before the court?
RESULTS ❯