Federal Court


Immigration

EXCLUSION AND EXPULSION
Applicant did not show meaningful rehabilitation

Applicant’s appeal of removal order on humanitarian and compassionate grounds was dismissed. Application for judicial review was dismissed. IAD’s reasons considered interests of applicant’s child. IAD was reasonable in assessment of lack of financial dependency of child on father. IAD considered all evidence. It was reasonable to conclude applicant did not show meaningful rehabilitation. IAD’s consideration of availability of family support system and recognition of positive factor was reasonable. IAD’s determination of applicant’s economic establishment was reasonable.

Koonjoo v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)

(Oct. 21, 2011, F.C., Near J., File No. IMM-1231-11) 208 A.C.W.S. (3d) 375 (13 pp.).

cover image

DIGITAL EDITION

Subscribers get early and easy access to Law Times.

Law Times Poll


An Ontario lawyer says that solicitor-client privilege may be threatened by a master’s decision that barred him from representing his own firm in a dispute over a wrongful dismissal claim. Do you agree with the lawyer's assessment?
RESULTS ❯