Federal Court


Immigration

EXCLUSION AND EXPULSION
Applicant did not show meaningful rehabilitation

Applicant’s appeal of removal order on humanitarian and compassionate grounds was dismissed. Application for judicial review was dismissed. IAD’s reasons considered interests of applicant’s child. IAD was reasonable in assessment of lack of financial dependency of child on father. IAD considered all evidence. It was reasonable to conclude applicant did not show meaningful rehabilitation. IAD’s consideration of availability of family support system and recognition of positive factor was reasonable. IAD’s determination of applicant’s economic establishment was reasonable.

Koonjoo v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)

(Oct. 21, 2011, F.C., Near J., File No. IMM-1231-11) 208 A.C.W.S. (3d) 375 (13 pp.).

cover image

DIGITAL EDITION

Subscribers get early and easy access to Law Times.

Law Times Poll


A report is making waves because it reveals statistics about composition of juries in two Eastern Ontario regions, which lawyers say show how the system can be biased. Do you believe Ontario juries are representative of all the people who come before the court?
RESULTS ❯