mt_ignore
Legal Feeds
Canadian Lawyer
jobsinlaw.ca
Supreme Court | Federal Court | Federal Appeal | Ontario Civil | Ontario Criminal | Tax Court

Immigration

INADMISSIBLE AND REMOVABLE CLASSES

Conditional sentence did not represent term of imprisonment

In 1989, applicant arrived in Canada from Vietnam and became permanent resident. In 2013, he was convicted on charge of producing marijuana and given conditional sentence of 12 months to be served in community. Officer of Canadian Border Services Agency referred applicant’s file to Immigration Division to decide whether applicant should be found to be inadmissible to Canada for having been convicted of offence for which term of imprisonment greater than six months had been imposed, or offence punishable by maximum term of imprisonment of at least 10 years. Applicant applied for judicial review of officer’s decision. He asked court to overturn officer’s decision and order another officer to reconsider question of his inadmissibility to Canada. Application allowed. Applicant’s conditional sentence of 12 months did not represent term of imprisonment greater than six months. Conditional sentence was not term of imprisonment within meaning of Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (Can.). Applicant’s offence was punishable by maximum of seven years’ incarceration. While maximum sentence was subsequently raised to 14 years, applicant was not punishable by sentence of that duration. Officer should not have considered arrests and dropped charges that did not result in convictions. That rendered his decision unreasonable. Matter was referred back to another officer for reconsideration.
Tran v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) (Nov. 4, 2014, F.C., James W. O’Reilly J., File No. IMM-7208-13) 246 A.C.W.S. (3d) 649.

  • Access to Justice
    Access to Justice The Action Group on Access to Justice (TAG) strives to inform the public on the importance of the people having access to legal resources and…
  • Legal Aid lawyers rally for collective bargaining rights
    Legal Aid lawyers rally for collective bargaining rights Legal Aid Ontario lawyers held three protests in July to push the provincial government to support their attempts to unionize. The lawyers have been in…
  • Jane-Finch community gets employment law help
    Jane-Finch community gets employment law help Osgoode Hall Law School's Community Legal Aid Services Programme recently opened an employment law division for Toronto's Jane-Finch community.Phanath Im, review counsel for the division,…
More Law Times TV...

Law Times poll

A recent Court of Appeal decision acknowledged a ‘new reality’ of civil litigation in which courts are seeing a significant number of self-represented litigants. Are courts are doing a good job of addressing the needs of self-represented litigants?
Yes, judges are doing a good job of ensuring trial fairness.
No, courts have only just begun to consider the many issues surrounding self-represented litigants.